Old and New, the Oscar Season Approaches
The Oscar season 2006 looks to be much more varied and potentially more exciting than the drab affair that was 2005. While the steady stream of socially and politically conscious filmmaking from last year was a creatively exceptional one on a few fronts, it also set the stage for a number of pitfalls for filmmakers struggling to inject purpose and importance into their work. The showdown come Oscar night was fated from the outset, it seemed, and the two most divisive films of the oeuvre came head to head. The result was embraced by some; reviled by others.
And so we begin to dip our toes into a new season. The Toronto and Telluride Film Festivals are on the horizon, where studios begin their Oscar campaigns in earnest, gathering various reactions to their upcoming fall film product and testing the waters of critical reception. But as of this time, only a precious few films have boasted any real potential for Oscar success.
Universal’s “United 93” remains the most critically acclaimed film of the year. Cannes claimed residence amongst the awards season for Paramount Vantage’s “Babel” and, perhaps, Lionsgate’s “Bug.” The June release of Fox’s “The Devil Wears Prada” was met with universal acclaim for another revered Meryl Streep performance. And next week Paramount releases “World Trade Center,” a moment that will largely be seen as the kickoff for the 2006 film awards season.
All of this we know.
What we don’t know is which of the upcoming perceived “Oscar heavies” will inevitably crash and burn in accordance with the legacies left by such films as “Pay it Forward,” “The Shipping News,” “Alexander” and “Kingdom of Heaven.” What we don’t know is which thespian’s career is going to receive a jumpstart as a result of awards success, much like Jamie Foxx in 2004 or Terrence Howard just last year. What we don’t know is how the season will be defined. What will the industry and audiences have learned when the curtain falls on the 79th Annual Academy Awards? What effect will the awards season have on the legion of projects awaiting budgetary consideration, green lights, or otherwise, rejection? What we don’t know is so much more fun.
An Oscar column on the cusp of August is largely intangible, and certainly subjective – much more so than anything that could spring up in the midst of the season. The lack of knowledge is vast, but it also provides the final stage for rampant speculation above all else. For many, that is where the excitement lives. Next month, eyes will finally be set upon awards hopefuls such as New Line’s “Little Children,” Universal’s “The Black Dahlia,” Sony’s “All the King’s Men” and Fox Searchlight’s “The Last King of Scotland.” But right now, Paramount’s “World Trade Center” is out of the bag, Focus’s “Hollywoodland” is continuing its slow roll of screenings…and that’s about all we have to go on. I’m seeing two of the Oscar big guns this week, and those viewings could certainly affect my ponderings herein, but I wanted to give one more somewhat, shall we say, uninformed look at the pool below before taking that fateful dive into the 2006 Oscar insanity.
Now, rather than bore the readership with a lengthy dissertation on rehashed or regurgitated information – information any Goggle search of “Oscar” and “predictions” would surely turn up – I think the best course of action in attacking the dawn of a new season is to take stock of where we are. News is few and far between in an Oscar race, but a few things of relevance are turning up as the year pushes forward, and such intricacies are what I’d like to discuss here today.
A point worthy of addressing right out of the gate is the lack of distributor interest in a number of awards hopefuls. As of this writing, no U.S. distributor has taken a shining to Milos Forman’s “Goya’s Ghosts” and Francis Ford Coppola’s “Youth Without Youth.” Why that is would be a point of speculation to be sure, but one thing is certain. A film lacking a distributor this late in the year is heading for trouble if it hopes to release on domestic soil by the Oscar deadline.
Of course, last year, Tommy Lee Jones’s “The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada” did not pick up U.S. distribution until after Toronto. The reasoning was fairly obvious. The film was arguably a rather poor debut effort from Jones, but it was inarguably a tough sell to general and awards-watching audiences alike. Sony Pictures Classics picked up the film in September, and by the end of the year, a quartet of Independent Spirit Award nominations was the only notable fruit of its labors.
Now, I am not saying that “Goya’s Ghosts” or “Youth Without Youth” are bad films. No one can discern as much quite yet. But I do believe a lack of studio interest this late in the game is enough to consider these films either headed for the 2007 slate, or not broad enough in their appeal to generate Oscar attention of any note. As such, you’ll find in today’s predictions update that both films have been removed from all charts, though they are still on the radar in our contenders archive in various forms.
A few things are beginning to come into focus on various fronts otherwise.
With the exclusion of “Goya’s Ghosts,” which might have presumably been a Warner Bros. pick-up given the history between the studio and Forman and producer Saul Zaentz, Steven Soderbergh’s “The Good German” stands as the studio’s likely lead contender. Under the new regime of former Focus consultant Michelle Robertson, Warner Bros. might be at the dawn of a new age where awards success is concerned, success that has largely alluded the studio for some time.
Meanwhile, Emilio Estevez’s “Bobby” is sliding into the poll position over at The Weinstein Company, a position generally considered chalked up to Anthony Minghella’s “Breaking and Entering” thus far. In fact, the shape of the Weinstein’s Oscar stable is beginning to make a lot more sense, as Stephen Frears’s “The Queen” and Chris Noonan’s “Miss Potter” look to be acting showcases for Oscar familiars Helen Mirren and Renée Zellweger respectively. The sophomore year for the new distributor could prove to be a bit more awarding than 2005.
Over at Sony, the concept of releasing Mike Binder’s 9/11 character study “Reign O’er Me” in December is being tossed around. The studio is staring at a likely divisive Sofia Coppola outing (“Marie Antoinette”) and a Steven Zaillian labor of love that is shaping up to be a miss in many respects (“All the King’s Men”) for their Oscar hopes.
Considerations were being turned to quirky entries like Marc Forster’s “Stranger Than Fiction” and Ryan Murphy’s “Running With Scissors” for Best Picture aspirations, but maybe counter-acting the other, more “expected” 9/11 releases with a story refreshingly anonymous, yet every bit as emotional in context, would indeed be the right move. Though “Memoirs of a Geisha” took a lion’s share of nominations and wins at last year’s ceremony, I’m sure the folks down in Culver City would like to finally grab another Best Picture berth. It has been a long drought since 1997’s “As Good As It Gets” after all.
Lionsgate bumped one of its awards hopefuls, “Trade,” to the 2007 schedule just last week, leaving last year’s Best Picture victor with a scant two Oscar contenders this season. William Friedkin’s “Bug” generated some hoopla for Ashley Judd’s apparently staggering performance when it screened at Cannes, while Griffin Dunne’s “Fierce People” is one of those films people have been talking about for so long they thought it already came and went. So it looks to be a lax year for Tom Ortenberg’s company this time around, and maybe they can make the best of what could be a return to form for Friedkin.
Typically awards-savvy, Focus Features has a similarly thin line-up on their hands under former Weinstein consultant Karen Fried, but the one-two punch of films looks to hold the right amount of potential for garnering a fair share of notices. When “Hollywoodland” drops in a month, much attention will be paid to the performances of Adrien Brody, Diane Lane and especially Ben Affleck. Meanwhile, Phillip Noyce’s apartheid drama “Catch a Fire” seems to be floating on the periphery of awards prognostication, waiting to be unleashed in October as what could be the first major awards success of Noyce’s somewhat uneven career.
Finally, Fox Searchlight really does have a glut of awards product on its hands this year. From films already in release, to a variety of upcoming ventures, the studio could be looking at a sizeable portion of the awards pie, potentially even Best Picture success for Kevin Macdonald’s “The Last King of Scotland” or Nicholas Hytner’s “The History Boys” (dependant upon critical reception and where the studio decides to place most of their monetary support).
The real discussion at the moment seems to be what to make of the performances in “Last King,” as James McAvoy, a certifiable lead in the piece, performs opposite a scenery chewing Forest Whitaker (in the role of Ugandan dictator Idi Amin). It will, again, be largely dependant upon the feedback the studio receives once they start screening the film, but the wise route to take might in fact be looking to Oscar history. In cases such as these, where clear leads are either overshadowed or otherwise held in check by smaller, showier roles (think “Training Day” or even “The Godfather”), the best course of action is to let the scene-stealer take his day in the sun – and a lead Oscar nomination for Forest Whitaker has been a long time in the making.
The rest of it you already know.
Dreamworks’s and Paramount’s “Dreamgirls” and “Flags of Our Fathers” are still considered the MVPs sight-unseen. But my doubts on “Flags of Our Fathers” are beginning to get the better of me – three straight Best Picture nominations?
Universal’s “The Good Shepherd” (which boasts a rather flat screenplay that may or may not be elevated considerably by the work of director Robert De Niro and his crew) is seemingly still awards magnet Universal’s lead horse. However, the promise of Alfonso Cuarón’s cautionary P.D. James adaptation “Children of Men” or the already critically tested and approved “United 93” could easily make cases for runs if the support and faith is there from the studio.
Stories of Robert Downey, Jr.’s finally turning a corner after a rough stretch in his career will (or should be) rampant. Too much attention will be paid to Martin Scorsese’s “The Departed,” expecting him to turn water into wine. Any number of nominations for “Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest” will be directly attributed by the media at large to the film’s box office success, while the absence of any number of nominations for “Superman Returns” will be attributed to its lack thereof.
But like I said. What we don’t know is so much more fun.
Main Category Charts
Technical Category Charts
Oscar Predictions Archive
Comments
I love your article here, and I agree, it just doesn't seem like Goya's Ghost is going to be a contender, although lots of ppl. continue to include it in it's charts...and anyways, even if it was, i don't think Goya would have a real chance at BP.
I think it's interesting that you've put Catch A Fire up so high on your chart for BP and for Derek Luke...it's surprising.
I'm still very curious about Bobby and I can't see World Trade Center being nearly as successful as you think it will be, but I suppose we will see soon how it is received widely and critically.
Also, I still have hopes for Flags of Our Fathers...I think it could be an excellent film.
--RC of strangeculture.blogspot.com
Posted by: RC of strangeculture | July 31, 2006 10:58 AM
As Goya's Ghosts was my most anticipated film this year I am very disappointed in the fact that it does not have a distributor at this late date. I have not heard anything bad about the film and I know that it has distributors in many parts of the world. One can only wonder why it does not have one in the US. Besides Goya and Youth, neither Inland Empire or Copying Beethoven have US distributors as of yet.
That leaves me to root for Babel. It certainly seems to be the most interesting film of the lot and I am a big fan of Inarritu's. I am also looking forward to Children of Man.
But I have a feeling that traditional Oscar fare such as Dreamgirls and World Trade Center will get many nominations. These are not films that I am highly anticipating but what I like and what AMPAS likes doesn't always match.
By the way, I really liked Tommy Lee Jones' The Three Burials. I thought that it was a great film and it did win two awards at Cannes.
Posted by: princessofpeace | July 31, 2006 04:00 PM
I am the only one who thinks that Dreamgirls may tank. I mean Memoirs of a Geisha, no matter how may tech oscars it won, was nothin but a dissapointment. And now Condon is following that up with a film starring Eddie Murphy & Beyonce!? And am i the only one who is sick Jamie Foxx?
It might turn out to rack up some nominations, but I think it is a little early to throw it at the top of the charts.
Posted by: eraserhead | July 31, 2006 10:01 PM
At this point, as early as it is, a profound case can be made against any film at the top of the charts. But on the smallest basis of appeal, "Dreamgirls" has to be seen as the most likely to have widespread appeal in the Academy.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | July 31, 2006 10:31 PM
you are absolutely right that it has the most widespread appeal, and i can see why you put it at the top. it just seems weird that everyone is so easily predicting its success after what happened with Memoirs. I will be all the more impressed if it turns out great, but I wouldn't be suprised if it ended up like The Phantom of the Opera. Sight unseen, I like the chances of The Good Shepard and WTC, but thats just me.
I am just happy that some Oscar columns are finally showin up on the web. Keep up the good work. I've been readin you since your Oscarwatch days.
Posted by: eraserhead | July 31, 2006 11:24 PM
Sight officially seen, WTC is a hard one to beat. What a wonderful, nearly flawless film.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | August 1, 2006 01:59 PM