Starting To Get Serious
I’ve been in the position of predicting Oscar nominations for six years now. However, only during the last 12 months have I seen the films in question a number of months prior to release. Frankly, that’s a more difficult position to be in. It isn’t a question of letting one’s personal feelings get in the way of prognostication. That has never been the case with me and it never will. What makes it difficult is to live inside the confines of an echo-chamber with very few voices bouncing off the walls.
It takes a deep reading of consensus to properly gauge an Oscar season, and I have actually accepted the realization that I have to play the board as the pieces fall. Sometimes this makes for a more thorough reasoning of a given film or performance’s awards potential, and sometimes it comes at the risk of less accuracy than I’ve experienced in years past. Above all else, it’s clear now more than ever that the season reveals itself at its own pace.
We now find ourselves within that 20 week time frame that ignites coverage in earnest. Studios are buying Oscar advertising like hotcakes. Traditional media outlets like the Los Angeles Times are preparing weekly supplements with the paper concentrating on the awards coverage at The Envelope. And vast critical judgment is being placed on films in contention, awards hopes rising or being dashed with each new opinion tossed into the pot.
This week, the Oscar charts get a massive shake-up as a number of things come to light. This might well be the last hurrah for Clint Eastwood’s “Flags of Our Fathers.” Getting a big bump to the #5 spot on the Best Picture chart just a week after I defended the film’s Oscar potential, we’re beginning to see an interesting divide amongst the critics on this film that just doesn’t speak to the situation that was “Munich” like some may believe.
On the outskirts, Martin Scorsese threatens that lone director position for his work on “The Departed,” a film that still doesn’t feel like a Best Picture contender to me, especially with “The Good German” on the way. But across-the-board critical approval and a justifiable box office sensation is tough to bet against, so come what may…
Over at Fox Searchlight, the campaign for “Little Miss Sunshine” has begun as the first screeners of the season went out to 6,000 plus Academy members earlier this week. In the event of a “Flags” exit, the light-hearted, critically acclaimed comedy sits poised to slip into the big race.
“The Queen” already represents a critical favorite amongst the likely final five, and interestingly, “Little Miss Sunshine” and “The Departed” add to what could end up being a critics’ year in the Best Picture race, should the latter make it into contention. Any serious consideration for the modest critical hit “Little Children” remains questionable at best, and more in the realm of wishful thinking.
That supporting actress mess I was sloshing through last week became a little clearer to me this time around as I placed a few bets on Adriana Barraza in “Babel” (getting great notices from groups like the Hollywood Foreign Press) and Carmen Maura in “Volver” (who looks likely to join co-star Penelope Cruz for Pedro Almodovar’s critically beloved film).
Annette Bening’s fantastic portrayal in Ryan Murphy’s “Running with Scissors” sadly looks to be on the edges, once considered around these parts a shoo-in for the win. The recent Newsweek appraisal notwithstanding, I’m not sure this wonderful turn is as solid as it once was. The unfair critical thrashing the film has received in some circles is also beyond comprehension. It’s difficult to understand how someone could dislike this film, let alone hate it, but alas, that’s the nature of the beast. The opinions of many, not one, are to be taken into account, and at the end of the day, an overall thumbs down may be enough to give Cruz the edge over Bening’s “performance of her career,” as husband Warren Beatty has considered it.
As for the films hitting screens in the coming weeks – well – I just haven’t felt passionate enough to crank out reviews. I’ve written briefly about “The Prestige” twice, and I seriously don’t have it in my heart to write a lengthy pan of Chris Nolan’s effort. “Marie Antoinette” is a sluggish mess that lacks any and all insight into the world and character depicted, while “Infamous” is a fun romp with pretty costumes and sets and nothing more. A central caricature and awkward direction kind of sunk the ship on that one. “For Your Consideration,” meanwhile, just misses the boat completely on the potential for a brilliant piece of filmmaking. I’ll have a personal view of “Fur” tomorrow afternoon, but I’m not on the edge of my seat for that one, to be honest. “Pan’s Labyrinth” and, finally, “Venus” soon enough.
Personally I’m ready for this evening to roll around so I can hit up the 3-D premiere of “The Nightmare Before Christmas” over at the El Capitan.
Anyway, that’s where the pieces are falling this week. The detail in the charts speaks volumes, though one final note, regarding Anna Boden and Ryan Fleck’s “Half Nelson.” It seems screenplay for the Ryan Gosling starrer will wind up considered original after all, as the duo’s feature screenplay was written before “Gowanus,” the short from which the film was expanded, was produced. Tell a friend.
Main Category Charts
Technical Category Charts
Oscar Predictions Archive
"The Contenders"
Previous Oscar Columns:
10/09/06 - "'Flags' Lands and the Supporting Actresses Need Sustenance"
10/02/06 - "What's in a lead anyway?"
09/18/06 - "Aftermath"
09/11/06 - "It's All Happening."
09/04/06 - "Aw, Canucks."
08/28/06 - "On Your Marks..."
08/14/06 - "Enough Foreplay!"
08/07/06 - "Don't Knock Masturbation; it's Sex with Someone I Love"
07/31/06 - "Old and New, the Oscar Season Approaches"
Comments
So, is Running With Scissors getting thrashed that badly? I think with an good campaign, Annette could win.
Posted by: Hardy | October 16, 2006 05:11 PM
Annette is out (because despite what Kris says, the movie deserves every bit of thrashing it has and will get).
On another note, Kris, I'm surprised you're leaving "The Prestige" in so many technical categories. I hope you're right, but I doubt it'll pull off more than 2 nominations, and I love the movie.
Posted by: John Y | October 17, 2006 02:37 AM
Looking at the box office numbers, The Illusionist is turning out to be the sleeper hit of the summer-fall season. Anything on the script for this one.
I could see a mile away that FLAGS OF OUR FATHERS was not going anywhere.
Posted by: RichardA | October 17, 2006 09:50 AM
You ever read _The Wisdom of the Crowds_, Kris? It's a fantastic piece on consensus. In the final ballot, the academy is neither 100% populist nor 100% critical/arty so it's guaranteed to piss everyone off who bothers to write or talk about the subject.
I think Departed is more likely to get a nomination for cinematography and editing more than any other category. The cinematographers nominating will be more likely to nominate the exquisite camerawork and sculpted light Ballhaus and Scorsese came up with than they are Eastwood's over use of a DI in Flags of Our Fathers. Something that blatently digital the academy cinematographers tend to have a bias against (see O Brother Where Art Thou, or the lack cinematography of nomination for Collateral). If the academy at large were nominating cinematography, Flags would be a likely nomination just for it's dramatic look.
I'm still interested in the public's reaction to Flags, so far the shrillest (and writing from a marginal perspective) web critics (Poland, Welles) have blasted the film while its received almost unreserved praise from the mainstream perspective critics.
I'd also say the Queen is a contender in Art Direction.
Posted by: Adam | October 17, 2006 04:12 PM
Poland may be annoying, but "Flags" just really isn't that good. Its structure is disjointed to the point of killing any emotional impact the film may have had, and the script is really pretty terrible.
None of that means it won't get nominated, of course. It's a war movie directed by Clint Eastwood, and it should in theory appeal to the middlebrow crits. But if any "sure thing" movie misses the final five, it'll be "Flags."
Posted by: Matt Noller | October 17, 2006 07:53 PM
It seems to me that a 'three for three' situation (consisting of 'Mystic River', 'Million Dollar Baby' and 'Flags of Our Fathers') is pretty much unprecedented - I agree that it would seem to be the first to fall by the wayside. As for Scorsese, I'm also not too convinced that a remake of a recent film that garnered excellent critical notices will be honoured by 'traditional' members of the Academy?
As for Best Actress, I'm counting out Bening, though I'd tip Blanchett for 'The Good German' at the moment. Or Zellweger, Oscar-begging with Weinstein at the helm - sure-fire, no?
Posted by: kermit_the_frog | October 18, 2006 05:31 AM
I hope the Prestige gets more than the technical nods myself. I'd love to see Michael Caine or Bale up for something.
Posted by: gondomagickingdom | October 18, 2006 11:21 AM