Signs of Life
I've been back in the City of Angels for a little over a week now. I've been driving across the country for the better part of three months, and the blissful ignorance of the film industry has been quite the needed vacation. Seriously, I've seen four movies this year. I haven't even seen "Pirates" yet! But catching up is part of the fun (and part of the pain).
With that in mind, I suppose it may be time to start poking at the awards season. I've been fully removed in body and spirit from the race since I left in March, but looking back over my year in advance predictions, I still think a case is there to be made for my predicted five in the Best Picture category. Nothing much has changed, though perspectives have certainly been molded slowly.
The Cannes International Film Festival was a flag in the ground for the Coen brothers' "No Country for Old Men," which still left empty-handed. "Away from Her" has continuously been one of the most beloved excursions of the year, still a major play for actress Julie Christie. Most recently we've seen the trailer for Ridley Scott's "American Gangster" hit, fit with a graphic scheme raping "The Departed" without a second look. But the film still looks like a showcase for Denzel Washington and maybe some technical notice.
So without digging in too deeply, I thought I'd toss the ball in your court, for those who still check this space for signs of life. What does the upcoming Oscar season look like? I offer this space up for your banter.
Comments
I think you can remove Jane Fonda (in "Georgia Rule") from contention in the supporting actress race.
Posted by: Ladymerlin | June 9, 2007 07:19 PM
Please remove Angelina Jolie (A Mighty Heart) too. She's certainly out of contention.
I've read the script for Margot at the Wedding. It certainly has lots of potential. Have you seen the script?
Posted by: numberina | June 9, 2007 07:37 PM
I think "Once" should make it onto your radar screen. It got great buzz coming out of Sundance and should contend in the Song/Score categories if nothing else. Not sure if it will have the momentum of LMS from last year but it's a wonderful film.
Also, I think 3:10 to Yuma comes out this year so that may be an awards vehicle possibility for Bale, Crowe, Mangold, etc.
Posted by: BNick | June 10, 2007 09:47 AM
Lions for Lambs script is not good, IMO. Too preachy and forced. Then again, the academy liked Crash so what do I know?
Posted by: Mr. Gittes | June 10, 2007 02:48 PM
I thought I am Legend could be this years Children of Men. But the trailer makes it out to be just an action pic. A cool trailer nonetheless, but the book is more about isolation, sanity, loneliness, etc, not action. Seems weird its coming out in December, not July. Akiva Goldsman wrote the script...crap.
Posted by: Mr. Gittes | June 10, 2007 02:54 PM
Angelina Jolie has gotten some good buzz out of Cannes. I say she gets a nomination.
How about Knocked Up? Maybe for screenplay?
Posted by: cleopatrajones | June 10, 2007 05:56 PM
With Alan Ball's previous track record, never count him out. Early screenings of his directorial debut with "Nothing is Private" has garnered some attention, especially for the lead actress Summer Bishil. And Thomas Newman's doing the score.
Posted by: clarkehead | June 11, 2007 02:52 PM
if you think the "american gangster" trailer rips off "the departed", you haven't seen the trailer for "we own the night".
Posted by: Chad | June 12, 2007 02:03 PM
Andy Griffith for Supporting Actor in Waitress. Seriously, he has two tremendously important scenes with great speeches and his performance is outstanding as well. It's exactly the sort of thing the academy will really go for if it's played the right way by searchlight.
Keri Russell also seems strong for Waitress, moreso than Katherine Heigl who did wonders with a difficult role, but Russell has the much more traditional academy banner.
Sticking in best actress I think Blanchett will be overlooked because the academy, and critics, will claim she's only repeating the same old same old. Was Depp nominated for Dead Man's Chest?
Vanessa Redgrave has nothing in Atonement that will merit any attention. Romola Garai is very good, with two good scenes (one overshadowed completely by McAvoy and Knightly), but 50% of the movie belongs to Saoirse Ronan whose tremendous performance brings off the entire film.
Likewise McAvoy is a frontrunner for lead actor, he's in more of the movie than any other role, about 80% and it's definitely very much his and Briony's story.
Knightly's role is strong enough to merit attention for her in lead actress.
Joe Wright would be a classic lone director nomination, as the film may be too complex for AMPAS.
Charlie Wilson's War will do will with the AMPAS of 'Crash' crowd, Hanks may coast in, but Hoffman has the fun role (Roberts has nothing interesting to do) and may sneak in.
I think Javier Bardem may be moved to lead, like Daniel Day Lewis was in Gangs of New York.
Posted by: movielocke | June 18, 2007 02:22 AM
Great thoughts all around, though Blanchett will be far from "same old" in Golden Age. It's a completely different task as the character is entirely on ifferent terrain. She's just a kid in Elizabeth. In Golden Age, she commands an empire.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | June 19, 2007 04:56 PM
Marion Cotillard hands down for best actress. absolutely brillant as Piaf in La Vie En Rose
Posted by: jackfro | June 19, 2007 08:31 PM