Launching the New Season
Going into the pre-Toronto frame, we finally kick off our weekly Oscar coverage here at In Contention. Hopefully “weekly” won’t become a relative term as the season (and grad school) progresses, but we’ll see how it goes. For now, there are actually a few things worth discussing, even if there is little hard news to bandy about.
For instance, coming out of Venice it looks like Joe Wright’s “Atonement” could just be the first clearly defined Best Picture contender of the season. There are those who might say Fox Searchlight’s “Once” has the steam, but people are tripping over themselves for the Ian McEwan adaptation that, at the very least, will sweep through the BAFTAs like a monsoon.
Most studios still seem content with sitting on their product rather than announcing awards potential, a sound strategy the year after “Dreamgirls” was deemed unstoppable by Dreamworks publicity early in the 2006 season. There’ve been lots of peek-a-boo screenings for some films in order to keep the excitement (or lack thereof) bottled up. Studios seem more particular than ever about who sees their films and when. “In the Valley of Elah,” for instance, was screening months ago in this fashion but only started to fall before a significant number of eyes last week.
Screenings of “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford” and “Michael Clayton” are taking place on the Warner lot, though the studio has been adamant about embargoes (many of them crashing this weekend). The former is splitting a great number of critics, though it has been dubbed a masterpiece in some circles, while the latter is finding appreciation but little passion.
We can stick a wet finger to the win to discern some things in other quarters. For instance, there was one “Elizabeth: The Golden Age” pre-Toronto screening set (that I’m aware of), though Universal has already booked “American Gangster” all over the place post-fest and was even testing it as recently as two weeks ago. That might give an indication of Best Picture excitement, or it might not. The fact that no one seems willing to talk up “Charlie Wilson’s War” yet should be taken into account as well. It’s the closest thing to a frontrunner on paper, but no one wants that moniker the year after the most un-promoted film took the whole enchilada.
Meanwhile, I’ve heard varying things on varying films. “The Kite Runner” is apparently much better than the schmaltzy trailer would suggest, with lots of love at least from those with an interest. No one is beating down my doors about it, mind you, but it seems to be satisfying across the board. The film does seem like it could be a secret weapon for Paramount Vantage, even if they are already in the process of post-fest pushes for both “Into the Wild” and “Margot at the Wedding.”
I’ve already heard “it’s this year’s ‘All the King’s Men’” as it pertains to Gavin Hood’s “Rendition.” Apparently it might be a train wreck, though like any good journalist, I’ll suggest you take that with a grain of salt as we’ll all make up our own minds sooner or later. Keeping it in the New Line wheelhouse, some apparently felt the “Golden Compass” footage shown at Comic-Con was flat and left them unsatisfied (I missed the panel). Not good for something as epic as a “His Dark Materials” adaptation, but we’ll see how the whole picture plays out.
Oh, and last week someone told me “Lars and the Real Girl” boasts Ryan Gosling’s best performance to date, and that the film is a real winner. For what it’s worth.
Of the films already released, it seems “Hairspray” will find joy amongst the craft categories, especially in the design fields. “Once” has two original songs eligible for consideration, while “Waitress” has one, so Searchlight will be trying to get the word out on those. The summer blockbusters still look to dominate in the sound and visual effects fields, though potential sequel fatigue has Searchlight hopeful a film like “Sunshine” could penetrate for its exceptional visuals.
“3:10 to Yuma” has a week before release, but it already boasts a wealth of supporters that might just give Lionsgate the reason they need to launch a full scale attack, with merely “Trade” left to show. And, of course, the lead actress category was stacked before the Oscar season began to take shape, with Julie Christie (“Away from Her”), Marion Cotillard (”La Vie en Rose”) and Angelina Jolie (“A Mighty Heart”) already packing heat. Jodie Foster will add to that mix in two weeks with a good performance in a not-so-good film (“The Brave One”).
But for now, we wait until the dust settles in Toronto and Telluride. First looks at a number of films will tell the tale, leaving a few outlying big guns still to bow. Will upcoming efforts like “Charlie Wilson’s War” and “Sweeney Todd” still manage a foothold if the stacked festival line-up proves to be a solid one? Or could negative fallout from a variety of films leave holes in the season for such latter year entries to waltz right on through? We’ll know in two weeks time, and then it’ll be a whole new guessing game.
After all, there are only five slots to fill.
Main Category Charts
Technical Category Charts
The Contenders (by category)
2007 Films-by-Studio Rundown
Oscar Predictions Archive
Previous Oscar Columns:
08/03/07 - "August Update"
07/01/07 - "The Silence is Deafening"
02/26/07 - "Forging Ahead: In Contention's Year in Advance Oscar Speculation"
Comments
Where can I see the eligibles songs of each film?
Posted by: Mr. Daho | September 3, 2007 11:23 AM
Not sure where you've heard that Rendition may be a train wreck, but an advance screening review I read was very positive, and the screenplay has received solid marks. I think that talk might just be someone trying to derail the movie--I heard similar predictions about 3:10 to Yuma, and look how well it turned out. Plus, "this year's All the King's Men" already came out: Evening.
Plus, Gavin Hood got the chance to helm Wolverine based on the reception to Rendition.
Posted by: Corran | September 3, 2007 11:44 AM
I too would like to know the two eligible songs for Once. I've been trying to figure them out, but the only one I really think is original is "The Hill." Any confirmation, please?
Posted by: Positive Jon | September 4, 2007 06:12 PM
Capsule review from Toronto Star re Rendition from someone who has seen the film. Sounds good to me...
http://www.thestar.com/entertainment/FilmFestival/article/252379
"Director Gavin Hood's follow-up to Best Foreign Language Oscar winner Tsotsi is a crackling international thriller – starring Jake Gyllenhaal, Reese Witherspoon, Meryl Streep and Peter Sarsgaard – about an Egyptian-American man who boards a plane but never gets off – at least not anywhere he'd planned on going. Focused on the controversial U.S. government practice of extraordinary rendition, the movie has both craft and conscience to burn, emphasizing a steady, suspenseful simmer of events over their angry indictment. (Sept. 7, 6:30 p.m., RTH; Sept. 8, 9 a.m., Ryerson.) GP"
Posted by: Reel1 | September 4, 2007 08:18 PM
"Falling Slowly" and "If You Want To Know" are the two eligible songs from "Once."
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | September 4, 2007 08:18 PM
RE: Rendition, just conveying what I heard. Not taking a stand one way or the other.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | September 4, 2007 08:19 PM
Oh, and the song from "Waitress" is "Baby Don't You Cry."
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | September 4, 2007 08:20 PM
Wow "Falling Slowly" qualifies? It was on another Frames CD, so I thought the snippy Music people would say it was ineligible. However, if it IS eligible, I do think it has an amazing shot at winning. Easily the most memorble song in the film.
Posted by: Positive Jon | September 5, 2007 09:09 AM
I just checked, and there's no song on the Once soundrack called "If You Want to Know." Do you mean "If You Want Me"? If that is the other eligible song, then they once again probably had to curve Academy rules to get the second best song in the film to qualify.
Again, the Music people are pretty snippy, so I'll take this with a grain of slt, but if they did get them through, whoa boy.
Posted by: Positive Jon | September 5, 2007 09:15 AM
I just checked, and there's no song on the Once soundrack called "If You Want to Know." Do you mean "If You Want Me"? If that is the other eligible song, then they once again probably had to curve Academy rules to get the second best song in the film to qualify.
Again, the Music people are pretty snippy, so I'll take this with a grain of slt, but if they did get them through, whoa boy.
Posted by: Positive Jon | September 5, 2007 09:15 AM
Weird typo on my part, Jon. Yes, the song is "If You Want Me."
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | September 5, 2007 09:59 AM
And no need to take it with a grain of salt. I'm looking at the DVD screener right now, and under for your consideration, those are the two songs listed. For now, in any case.
Posted by: Kristopher Tapley | September 5, 2007 10:00 AM
Jon, both of those songs were written for the movie, then re-recorded for the CD they appeared on before the movie's release. It's Bird York all over again.
Posted by: hurricanesmith | September 5, 2007 11:48 AM
Ah, good ol' loopy Academy rules. Not that I'm complaining...:)
Posted by: Positive Jon | September 5, 2007 12:08 PM