Christopher Nolan is, in my opinion, one of the most exciting directors of his generation. And while "The Prestige" is nowhere near his best work, it's still fantastic entertainment. Fundamentally, that is the result of Nolan's ability to direct suspense, taking us through many twists and turns, always keeping us entertained and surprised. The fact that the magic is really cool as well is a big bonus. Christian Bale and Hugh Jackman carry the film with ease while Rebecca Hall, Michael Caine and David Bowie (!) shine in support (Scarlett Johansson and Andy Serkis are serviceable). Meanwhile, Joan Bergin and Nathan Crowley do what is the best work of their careers with Wally Pfister's efforts being not that far behind.
I've got to admit that the plot becomes somewhat convoluted as the film goes on with the narrative not being told in the wisest of ways. And while it makes perfect sense, the ending feels a tad cheap. Because of this, I ultimately feel the film falls short of greatness. But the effort is still incredibly suspenseful, gorgeous to look at, very well acted and ultimately satisfying. I wish I could say the same about the other film from a young auteur I saw this weekend.
"And while it makes perfect sense, the ending feels a tad cheap."
I always thought that was the point--when you give away the magic trick's secret, it always feels a little cheap...I had a different experience than most watching the movie, as I had already read the book. It was similar to watching the movie for the second time. The Nolans did an excellent job adapting, though.
While the novel is told from two separate viewpoints, I don't believe it has the complexity of the movie, wherein one character is reading another character's reading of their own journal. The trial/murder framing device is also not present in the book, if i recall correctly. I think if it had been sold as a fantasy revenge/obsession movie, it wouldn't have felt like such a cheat to so many people.
Posted by: Kambei | October 31, 2006 07:43 AM